The problem of evil and suffering in the world is a big problem. So a 50-minute lesson was definitely NOT going to solve this problem.
My goal in the class was not to provide answers to every specific example of evil and suffering. It was to help believers strengthen their understanding of who God is and how God works so we can be more compassionate (loving) and truthful (confident) in our responses to questions about pain and suffering.
Ronald Nash, in Faith and Reason, writes, "Every philosopher I know believes the most serious challenge to theism is, was, and will continue to be the problem of evil."
Randy Newman, in Questioning Evangelism, writes, "The so-called problem of evil has always been a difficult question for Christians. Our critics have called it the Achilles ' heel of our faith."
The difficulty and challenge of the question should not make us avoid wrestling with the issue. In the same chapter, Newman goes on to write, "The truth is, we don't have an adequate answer for the problem of evil. No one does. We simply must have the honesty to admit it." (103)
In this post, I hope to clarify why this truth - we don't have an adequate answer for the problem of evil - is so hard and so glorious.
One of the challenges with this question is that there are two types of conversations people have about the problem of evil. The first is a logical, philosophical conversation. Laying out facts and points for each of the different arguments.
The second is so much more personal and experiential. The person in the midst of suffering and asking questions needs more than a step-by-step thought process.
We are going to look at Job 38 - 41, Romans 11:33-36, and Hebrews 11.
But let's first consider the question
What are evil and suffering?
The question itself points to the fact that there is a good, intended way life is supposed to be. How do you know what is evil? By knowing what is good. How do you know what suffering is? By knowing there is a way that would be better than the suffering. In The Problem of Pain, C.S. Lewis writes, "My argument against God was that the universe seemed so cruel and unjust, but how had I gotten this idea of just and unjust? A man does not call a line crooked unless he has some idea of a straight line. What was I comparing this universe with when I called it unjust?"
Evil and suffering occur because things in this world are broken. Consider this: the Creator's creation has been corrupted by sin.
This corruption can be seen at the moral level (sins committed by one person against another), natural level (original sin in all of mankind and suffering caused by natural disasters), and the supernatural level.
What is the problem of evil?
The problem people have with evil and suffering exists because God is all-powerful (omnipotent), all-knowing (omniscient), and all-good (omnibenevolent).
Here, Alvin Plantinga introduced the theistic set, a set of propositions, to think about the problem of evil. Here is the set.- God exists.
- God is omnipotent (all-powerful).
- God is omniscient (all-knowing).
- God is omnibenevolent (all-good).
- God created the world.
- The world contains evil.
Where is the
contradiction?
Is it in God's omnipotence, #2? He should be able to deliver his people from evil and suffering.
Is it in God's omniscience, #3? He should know how to deliver his people from evil and suffering.
Is it in God's omnibenevolence, #4? He should want to deliver his people from evil and suffering.
Nash addresses two different forms of the problem.
Because there is evil in this world, the logical conclusion seems to be that this all-powerful, all-knowing, all-good God doesn't exist. This is the deductive problem of evil.
Because there is evil in this world, there is rational support for atheism. Therefore, the existence of God is rationally improbable.
So, how do we address the problem of evil?
What is theodicy?
There are a couple of very similar possible definitions of the word "theodicy."
One definition is "a justification of the ways of God in his dealings with men." (TGC). Another possible definition is "a defense of God's righteousness in light of the reality that evil exists in the universe He created." (
GTY)
Keep both of these definitions in mind as we continue to address the problem of evil.
There are many types of theodicies. Here is the list with no explanation, but you can read more about these at
TGC and
GTY.
- Free Will Theodicy
- Natural Law Theodicy
- Soul Making Theodicy
- eschatological Theodicy
- Finite God Theodicy
In studying this question and thinking about theodicy, I was struck by the idea of justifying God's ways and defending God's righteousness. What does it mean to defend God and His ways?
I am reminded of David in 1st Samuel 17.
Goliath has been coming out and defying God's people. No one stands up to this giant. In verse 32, David says he "will go and fight [Goliath]." David's going and fighting rests not in his strength but in God's hand (vv. 34 - 37). He tells Saul, "The LORD who rescued me... will rescue me from the hand of this Philistine." He proclaims to the Philistine, "You come against me with sword and spear and javelin, but I come against you in the name of the LORD Almighty, the God of the armies of Israel, whom you have defied. This day the LORD will deliver you into my hands."
David's defense of God was not based on God's weakness and need for someone to do something for Him.
David's defense of God was based on God's greatness and David's desire to make that known.
Apologetics is not finding the right thing to say to someone so they agree with your beliefs about God.
1 Peter 3:15 apologetics is about making much of our great God, no matter what the circumstances. It is sharing the hope you have in Christ in a winsome way.
Why is there evil and suffering in this world?
"Our response oo the problem of evil, then, may take
either of two approaches. We may argue that the second premise above is false
and seek to demonstrate that it is false by showing God’s reasons for
permitting evil – the way of “theodicy.” Or we could argue that the second
premise is unproven because unbelievers can’t rule out God’s
having a good reason for permitting evil – the way of 'inscrutability.'”
- MacArthur
Inscrutability
Romans 11
Mystery/Inscrutability/ Submission:
Holds that the reasons for suffering are beyond human
comprehension and must be accepted as a mystery of God’s sovereignty.
definition of inscrutability
not readily investigated, interpreted, or understood : mysterious
The Gospel Coalition
"The way of inscrutability
argues, more modestly, that no one knows that premise (2) is true
because no one can know enough to conclude that God doesn’t have good
reason for permitting evil. We just cannot grasp God’s knowledge, the
complexity of his plans, or the deep nature of the good he aims at in
providence. And there is no proof that God does not have good reasons
for allowing evil, but because he is good we can only assume that he does. Here
we don’t have to come up with ‘theodicies’ to defend God against the problem of
evil. Rather, the way of inscrutability shows that it is entirely to be expected
that creatures like us can’t come up with God’s reasons, given who God
is and who we are."
Romans 11:33-36
Hebrew 11
Last chapters of Job
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/essay/the-problem-of-evil/